Puzzled about direct current and charge (flux)

AI Thread Summary
Current is defined as the rate of change of charge, represented mathematically as i = dQ/dt, with charge being the integral of current over time, Q = ∫i dt. In a direct current (DC) circuit, the charge does not grow indefinitely at a single point; rather, it accumulates as charge flows past that point. The potential at a point cannot increase indefinitely due to physical limitations, such as circuit resistance and component ratings. The misunderstanding arises from conflating the charge at a point with the total charge that has passed that point over time. Ultimately, while charge can accumulate, it does not imply an infinite increase at any single location in the circuit.
daviddeakin
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
This is a question that has kept me awake, trying to rationalise it:

Current is rate-of-change-of-flux (or charge if you prefer, which is the same thing):
i = dQ/dt
Therefore, flux or charge is the time integral of the current.
Q = ∫i dt

Therefore, if you have a direct current, does this not imply that the flux/charge at a given point in the circuit keeps on growing indefinitely??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
daviddeakin said:
Therefore, if you have a direct current, does this not imply that the flux/charge at a given point in the circuit keeps on growing indefinitely??
No. The current in a circuit is the rate at which charge is flowing past a surface (or point).
 
daviddeakin said:
This is a question that has kept me awake, trying to rationalise it:

Current is rate-of-change-of-flux (or charge if you prefer, which is the same thing):
i = dQ/dt
Therefore, flux or charge is the time integral of the current.
Q = ∫i dt

Therefore, if you have a direct current, does this not imply that the flux/charge at a given point in the circuit keeps on growing indefinitely??

And how long could you keep this current flowing into a single point? The potential would pretty soon get so large that you couldn't continue. You are mis-interpreting the Maths.
 
Ah, so my mistake was to say "the charge at a given point", when it should be "the charge that has passed a point", which of course can accumulate indefinitely!
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top