Puzzled about direct current and charge (flux)

AI Thread Summary
Current is defined as the rate of change of charge, represented mathematically as i = dQ/dt, with charge being the integral of current over time, Q = ∫i dt. In a direct current (DC) circuit, the charge does not grow indefinitely at a single point; rather, it accumulates as charge flows past that point. The potential at a point cannot increase indefinitely due to physical limitations, such as circuit resistance and component ratings. The misunderstanding arises from conflating the charge at a point with the total charge that has passed that point over time. Ultimately, while charge can accumulate, it does not imply an infinite increase at any single location in the circuit.
daviddeakin
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
This is a question that has kept me awake, trying to rationalise it:

Current is rate-of-change-of-flux (or charge if you prefer, which is the same thing):
i = dQ/dt
Therefore, flux or charge is the time integral of the current.
Q = ∫i dt

Therefore, if you have a direct current, does this not imply that the flux/charge at a given point in the circuit keeps on growing indefinitely??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
daviddeakin said:
Therefore, if you have a direct current, does this not imply that the flux/charge at a given point in the circuit keeps on growing indefinitely??
No. The current in a circuit is the rate at which charge is flowing past a surface (or point).
 
daviddeakin said:
This is a question that has kept me awake, trying to rationalise it:

Current is rate-of-change-of-flux (or charge if you prefer, which is the same thing):
i = dQ/dt
Therefore, flux or charge is the time integral of the current.
Q = ∫i dt

Therefore, if you have a direct current, does this not imply that the flux/charge at a given point in the circuit keeps on growing indefinitely??

And how long could you keep this current flowing into a single point? The potential would pretty soon get so large that you couldn't continue. You are mis-interpreting the Maths.
 
Ah, so my mistake was to say "the charge at a given point", when it should be "the charge that has passed a point", which of course can accumulate indefinitely!
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top