Pythagoras Theorem: 32 + 42 = 52?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of the Pythagorean theorem, specifically the calculation of a triangle's hypotenuse. The correct formula is a² + b² = c², where a and b are the triangle's legs, and c is the hypotenuse. The example given, 3² + 4² = 5², illustrates that 9 + 16 equals 25, confirming that c equals 5 when taking the square root. A link to a resource on the theorem is provided for further clarification. Understanding this theorem is essential for solving problems related to right triangles.
hell18
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
to work out a traingle side e.g. 52

is it we first times the 3 by itself to get 9 and then we times the 4 x 4 to get 16. then we take away the difference to get 52?

9 + 16 = 25

Formula
32 + 42 = 52

is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To work out the hypoteneuse's (the side which does not end in a 90 degree angle) length, you square the first side and add it to the square of the second side. Then take the square root of the third side.

a2 + b2 = c2

32 + 42 = c2

9 + 16 = c2

c2= 25

c = [squ]25

c = 5
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top