Understanding Dedekind's Ketten: A Brief Explanation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Stoney Pete
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Dedekind's concept of a Kette, focusing on its definition and implications in the context of functions mapping natural numbers to subsets of themselves. Participants explore the nature of Ketten, particularly through the example of the function f(n)=2n and its recursive applications.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a Kette as an infinite set of subsets resulting from the recursive application of a function, specifically using f(n)=2n as an example.
  • Another participant cites Dedekind's definition, stating that a subset K is a Kette if the function φ(K) is a subset of K, without requiring K to equal φ(K).
  • It is noted that various subsets can be Ketten, such as the set of even numbers and multiples of 7, while the set of odd numbers does not qualify as a Kette.
  • There is a question about whether K must equal φ(S), which is clarified to indicate that K can be any subset of S as long as it meets the Kette criteria.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of Dedekind's definition of a Kette, with some focusing on specific examples and others on the broader implications of the definition. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise understanding of Ketten.

Contextual Notes

There are nuances in the definitions and examples provided, and the discussion reflects varying interpretations of the conditions under which a subset qualifies as a Kette.

Stoney Pete
Messages
49
Reaction score
1
Hi everybody,

I am struggling to precisely understand Dedekind's notion of a Kette. Perhaps you can help me.

I know a Kette has to do with how certain functions from N to N map N onto proper subsets of itself. Thus e.g. f(n)=2n maps N onto the set of the even numbers. Now my intuition is that a Kette for Dedekind is the infinite set of such subsets that result from recursive application of the function. So if we have f(n)=2n and recursively apply it to its own output, we get the following sets:

{2, 4, 6, 8,...}
{4, 8, 12, 16...}
{8, 16, 24, 32,...}
{16, 32, 48, 64,...}
Etc.

The Kette belonging to f(n)=2n would then be the set of all those subsets of N. Is this correct? Thanks for your answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stoney Pete said:
Hi everybody,

I am struggling to precisely understand Dedekind's notion of a Kette. Perhaps you can help me.

I know a Kette has to do with how certain functions from N to N map N onto proper subsets of itself. Thus e.g. f(n)=2n maps N onto the set of the even numbers. Now my intuition is that a Kette for Dedekind is the infinite set of such subsets that result from recursive application of the function. So if we have f(n)=2n and recursively apply it to its own output, we get the following sets:

{2, 4, 6, 8,...}
{4, 8, 12, 16...}
{8, 16, 24, 32,...}
{16, 32, 48, 64,...}
Etc.

The Kette belonging to f(n)=2n would then be the set of all those subsets of N. Is this correct? Thanks for your answers.
In Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen? Dedekind defines a Kette as follows (page 12):
If ##\phi: S \to S## is a function, then a subset ##K\subseteq S## is a kette if ##\phi(K) \subseteq K##. Dedekind uses the notation ##K'## for ##\phi(K)##.
Today we probably would call that a subset that is invariant under the function ##\phi##.
 
Last edited:
Samy, does Dedekind also mean that K=ϕ(S)?
 
Stoney Pete said:
Samy, does Dedekind also mean that K=ϕ(S)?
No, K can be any subset of S. It will be a kette if it is mapped to itself by ϕ. He doesn't even assume that for a kette K, K=ϕ(K). All that is needed is that ϕ(K) ⊆ K.

To take your example, ##\phi: \mathbb N \to \mathbb N: n \mapsto 2n##.
The subset of even numbers is a kette, the subset of all multiples of 7 is a kette, ...
The subset of odd numbers is not a kette.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ProfuselyQuarky
o.k. thanks for your answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
911
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
12K