Pythagorean Primes and Gaussian Primes, divisibility question

joeblow
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Here is an interesting problem that I've been thinking about for a while:

Let p be a prime s.t. p = 4m+1 for some integer m. Show that p divides n^2 + 1, where n = (2m)!

It comes from a section on principal ideal domains and unique factorization domains.

It is well-known that p is the sum of squares of two integers and thus is a norm of a Gaussian prime, and n^2 + 1 = (n+i)*(n-i).

However, I am not sure that this helps anything. Does anyone have any ideas. Your help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I figured it out. For those of you who want a hint, try to use Wilson's theorem. (I have no idea why this was in the section on PID's.) When I saw the factorial sign, I immediately tried Wilson's theorem, but I needed to be much more clever in order to get it to work.
 
In case other people find this thread I will post a solution:
2m+i \equiv (4m+1)-(2m+i) = 2m + 1 - i \pmod {4m+1}
Thus,
\prod_{i=1}^{2m} (2m+i) \equiv \prod_{i=1}^{2m} (2m + 1 - i) = \prod_{i=1}^{2m}(2m+1-(2m+1-i)) = \prod_{i=1}^{2m} i = (2m)! \pmod {4m+1}
This gives,
(4m)! = (2m)!\prod_{i=1}^{2m} (2m+i) \equiv (2m)!^2 \pmod {4m+1}
Now since 4m+1 is prime we can apply Wilson's theorem.
-1 \equiv (4m+1-1)! \equiv (2m)!^2 \pmod {4m+1}
Thus 4m+1 | (2m)!^2 + 1 which was to be shown.

I have no idea why this was in the section on PID's.
Wilson's theorem is introduced in the exercises around PIDs in many abstract algebra books. Usually this means that exercises on applying Wilson's theorem is scattered in nearby sections.
 
Wilson's theorem is not presented anywhere near this problem. I would assume that this problem is supposed to help you determine which gaussian integers are irreducible.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top