Q about diff. between ferro and paramagnetism under a strong mag field

AI Thread Summary
Ferromagnetic materials contain domains with magnetic dipoles that can align under an external magnetic field, leading to enhanced magnetization. In contrast, paramagnetic materials lack these domains, and their dipole moments align with the field but do not form stable structures. The presence of domains in ferromagnetic materials can complicate magnetization, as they can hinder alignment unless properly managed. Under strong magnetic fields, ferromagnetic materials achieve saturation magnetization more effectively than paramagnetic materials due to their inherent domain structure. Understanding the role of exchange interactions is crucial in differentiating between the two types of magnetism.
parsa418
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi
From what I understand ferromagnetic materials have domains that contain magnetic dipoles that are almost all parallel to each other. However these domains have random directions.
Under a magnetic field the domains in the ferromagnetic material that are magnetized in the field direction grow and the domains that aren't shrink.
However, in a paramagnetic material there are no domains. Under a magnetic field a lot of the dipole moments of a paramagnetic material become parallel with the field.
My first question is what makes having domains in a material better for magnetization?
My second question is under a strong magnetic field shouldn't both paramagnetic materials and ferromagnetic materials become equally magnetized because eventually all the dipole moments of both materials become parallel with the magnetic field? (is saturation magnetization related to this?)
Any help will be much appreciated
Thank you
Parsa
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Parsa! :smile:
parsa418 said:
My second question is under a strong magnetic field shouldn't both paramagnetic materials and ferromagnetic materials become equally magnetized because eventually all the dipole moments of both materials become parallel with the magnetic field? (is saturation magnetization related to this?)

I think it's only a question of degree …

both para and ferro depend on the exchange interaction (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchange_interaction), and if it's strong enough you get ferro, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paramagnetism#Relation_to_electron_spins
"If there is sufficient energy exchange between neighbouring dipoles they will interact, and may spontaneously align or anti-align and form magnetic domains, resulting in ferromagnetism (permanent magnets) or antiferromagnetism, respectively."​
My first question is what makes having domains in a material better for magnetization?

No, domains make it worse

to produce a strong ferromagnet, we need to eliminate the domains! :wink:
 
Thank you tiny-tim. Sorry for the late reply. I was travelling.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top