Q:Is it possible to do a coordinate transfomation in momentum space?

AI Thread Summary
Coordinate transformations in momentum space can be performed while conserving momentum in the lab frame, even for relativistic particles. Rotating the axes by specified angles results in new momentum components, P_x', P_y', and P_z', while maintaining the magnitude of the momentum vector. The relationship P^2 = P_x^2 + P_y^2 + P_z^2 = P_x'^2 + P_y'^2 + P_z'^2 holds true if the transformation is executed correctly. Additionally, the direction of the momentum vector is conserved, as the dot product remains invariant under these transformations. Understanding these principles is essential for accurate momentum analysis in physics.
FinalCatch
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Q: How does one do a coordinate transformation in momentum space while insuring conservation of momentum?

I have a several particles with momentum components P_x , P_y , P_z.
I would like to rotate the x, y, and z axis. By angle θ in the x/y and angle Θ in the y/z .
So giving new momentum P_x' , P_y' , P_z'.

Is it possible to do this an conserve momentum while remaining in the lab frame? (The particles are relativistic but I don't believe this matters). What are the coordinate transformations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The conserved quantity is a vector, you can rotate the basis vectors however you want and it wouldn't change the magnitude of the vector.
 
just to double check P^2=P_x^2 +P_y^2 +P_z^2=P_x'^2 +P_y'^2 +P_z'^2 correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
FinalCatch said:
just to double check P^2=P_x^2 +P_y^2 +P_z^2=P_x'^2 +P_y'^2 +P_z'^2 correct?

If you've done the transformation to the primed coordinates correctly, yes.

In fact, HomogeneousCow has understated how much is conserved; the direction of the vector is also conserved. Of course it's a bit tricky talking about the "direction" of a vector when you don't have coordinate axes to make angles with - (1,0) in coordinates in which the x-axis points to the northeast is the same vector in the same direction as ##\sqrt{2}/2(1,1)## in coordinates in which the x-axis points east, but it's not obvious at all from the coordinates that that is so.

However, the dot-product of two vectors is invariant under these coordinate transformations, and as the dot-product depends on the angle between the vectors, that gives us a coordinate-independent way of claiiming that direction is also invariant.
 
Last edited:
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top