Q: Measured changes in the CMB radiation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joe Ciancimino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cmb Radiation
AI Thread Summary
The cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation is a remnant from a singular event in the universe's history, remaining unchanged over time. However, as the universe expands, the wavelength of the CMB increases. The discussion raises the question of whether year-to-year changes in the average wavelength of the CMB can be measured, suggesting the potential for using this as a form of timekeeping. It is noted that even a 1% change in wavelength occurs over millions of years, making it unlikely that current instruments can detect such minute variations. Therefore, measuring year-to-year changes in the CMB's wavelength is deemed improbable with existing technology.
Joe Ciancimino
Messages
28
Reaction score
6
The cosmic microwave background was a single event that happened literally everywhere in pretty much a single instance. That moment was in the past and is unchanging. What does change is the wavelength of the radiation as it travels through the expanding universe causing the wavelength to grow longer as it passes through expanding space.

My question is this. Can we measure any year to year change in the average wavelength of the CMB? My thinking being, the CMB is the same distance from the observer at any single point in the universe. If such a change could be measured, could that not be used as a Newtonian clock? That is to say, rather than using time as the primary unit of measurement for the age of the universe post CMB to instead use a measurement entropy which would not be effected Lorentz changes due to gravity? (Or at least marginally effected, to which the difference could be ignored in most cases.)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Joe Ciancimino said:
My question is this. Can we measure any year to year change in the average wavelength of the CMB?

I don't think so. Even a 1% change to the wavelength takes something on the order of a million of years if I remember correctly. I'm not sure our instruments are sensitive enough to detect a change so small.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top