Q:What is the analogue of the excitation vector in the case of mass density?

AI Thread Summary
Mass density is identified as a 3-form, similar to electric charge density, with an exterior derivative of zero, indicating the existence of a corresponding 2-form. This 2-form, known as "excitation" in the context of electric charge density, raises the question of its nomenclature when applied to mass density. The discussion highlights the parallels between Maxwell's equations and fluid dynamics, suggesting that equations like Gauss's law and the Oersted-Ampere law have fluid-dynamic counterparts. The inquiry also seeks to understand the practical application of these equations in fluid dynamics. Overall, the relationship between mass density and its analogs in electromagnetism is explored, emphasizing the need for further investigation into their fluid-dynamic equivalents.
mma
Messages
262
Reaction score
5
Mass density is a 3-form, just like electric charge density. Hence it's exterior derivative is 0. This implies that there is a 2-form whose exterior derivative is the density 3-form. If this density is the electric charge density, then the name of this 2-form is "excitation" (D). But what is the name of it in the case when we speak about mass density instead off electric charge density? And where is it used?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course the above mentioned D excitation is the electric excitation (other name of it is electric displacement field). The equation which states that the exterior derivative of the electric excitation is the electric charge density is the so-called Gauss-law, and this is one of 4 the Maxwell's equations. And this equation must have a counterpart in fluid-dynamics, where the mass density plays the role of the electric charge density in this equation.

Moreover, there is another Maxwell's equation what must have a counterpart in fluid-dynamic. This is the Oersted-Ampere law. This equation follows directly from the continuity equation and from the Gauss-law. Regarding that both equations are valid not only in electrodynamics but in fluid-dynamics also, there must be a corresponding equation in fluid-dynamics, i.e. there must be a counterpart of the magnetic excitation field (H) also (this is an 1-form field).

Does anybody use these equations and quantities in fluid-dynamics?
 
I mean eqations (3.1) and (3.2) in http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0005084"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top