Q : write products formed when polyester is heated with aqueous sodium

  • Thread starter Thread starter charlotta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aqueous Sodium
AI Thread Summary
Heating polyester with aqueous sodium hydroxide leads to hydrolysis, producing alcohol and carboxylic acid. The presence of sodium hydroxide can influence whether the carboxylic acid retains its -OH group or is replaced by -ONa, depending on the amount of base used. Elevated temperatures can accelerate the reaction, but heating alone does not guarantee a reaction will occur. The extent of the reaction and the products formed are contingent on the sodium hydroxide concentration. Understanding the balance of reactants is crucial for determining the final products.
charlotta
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Q : write products formed when polyester is heated with aqueous sodium hydroxide

I know is hydrolysis , and the product will be alcohol and carboxylic acid ... but will the -OH in carboxylic acid replaces with -ONa or not ??
It say heated with , but doesn't mean react .. so does heated means react ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Heated means heated. However, reactions are faster at elevated temperatures.

If there is enough base it will neutralize the acid.
 


thank you ..

so what you mean is that to determine whether is -OH or -ONa , we have to know the amount of sodium hydroxide ?
 


That would be the best approach.
 


ok.. thank you ...
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Back
Top