Qausi-static displacement current (Purcell)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on Purcell's explanation of "quasi-static" displacement current and its effect on magnetic fields in slowly varying fields. It highlights that the curl of the displacement current, represented as curlJd, is nearly zero, leading to the conclusion that there is no magnetic field generated in such conditions. The confusion arises regarding how curlJd=0 directly implies that the magnetic field B is also zero. Participants are encouraged to clarify this relationship and whether the topic fits better in classical physics discussions. Understanding this concept is crucial for grasping the implications of displacement current in electromagnetic theory.
shooba
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
"Qausi-static" displacement current (Purcell)

Hello all,
On page 329, chapter 9 of Purcell's E&M book, he describes why the "displacement current" produces nearly zero magnetic field for slowly varying fields. By taking the curl of the displacement current Jd, he shows that curlJd=-(1/4\pic)(∂2B/∂t2), so that for slowly varying fields, curlJd is nearly zero. From this, using a symmetry/superposition argument he concludes that there can be no magnetic field for such a current distribution. It is this last step that I do not understand; how does curlJd=0 imply B=0?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Bump? Maybe this belongs in the classical physics section?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top