QCD Lagrangian: Multiplying 4x4 and 1x3 Matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter yola
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian Qcd
yola
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello,
In the lagrangian of QCD, there is q which is the quark field and it is the fundamental representation of SU(3). This q is multiplied by a gamma matrix and a q bar. So, how can we have a 4x4 matrix multiplying 1x3 matrix?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
q has not only a color index, but also a dirac spinor index. It is the spinor index that the gamma matrices contract. The color indices of q and qbar are contracted with each other for the spatial derivative term, and contracted with the T^a for the interaction with the gluon field term.
 
\bar{q} \gamma^\mu A_\mu q = \bar{q}_{i\alpha} \left(\gamma^\mu)^{\alpha\beta} \left(A_\mu\right)_{ik} q_{k\beta} = \bar{q}_{i\alpha} \left(\gamma^\mu)^{\alpha\beta} A^a_\mu \left(T^a\right)_{ik} q_{k\beta}

So the q's are 4-spinors (greek indices) with an additional color index i=1..3, the A's are 4-vectors with an additional color index a (in the adjoint rep. i.e. a=1..8) or an additional color-index pair ik=1..3.
 
Indices for flavor should be included as well, so that the gauge field has 3 types of indices.
 
OK, let's do that for the interaction term using f as the flavor index ...

\bar{q} \gamma^\mu A_\mu q = \bar{q}_{i\alpha f} \left(\gamma^\mu)^{\alpha\beta} \left(A_\mu\right)_{ik} q_{k\beta f} = \bar{q}_{i\alpha f} \left(\gamma^\mu)^{\alpha\beta} A^a_\mu \left(T^a\right)_{ik} q_{k\beta f}

... which means that the kinetic energy (which haven't written down here) and the gluon-interaction is flavor-neutral.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top