QFT: Bogolyiubov transformations and KG inner product

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating Bogoliubov coefficients for a (1+1) scalar field constrained within a Dirichlet box, using the Klein-Gordon invariant inner product. The user Joe seeks guidance on performing this calculation when the field modes are expressed in different coordinate systems: Minkowski and Rindler. Key references include Birrell & Davies, specifically section 4.5, which provides foundational concepts relevant to the problem. Joe successfully computed the integral using the chain rule, demonstrating the feasibility of the approach despite initial confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) concepts
  • Familiarity with Bogoliubov transformations
  • Knowledge of the Klein-Gordon equation and its inner products
  • Experience with boundary conditions in quantum systems, specifically Dirichlet conditions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Bogoliubov coefficients in different coordinate systems
  • Explore the Klein-Gordon invariant inner product in detail
  • Review the implications of Dirichlet boundary conditions on quantum fields
  • Investigate advanced topics in Quantum Field Theory, such as mode decomposition techniques
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and students in Quantum Field Theory, particularly those interested in the mathematical techniques for calculating Bogoliubov coefficients and understanding the implications of boundary conditions in quantum systems.

Joey21
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
(I hope this post goes in this part of the forum)

Hi,

I was wondering if someone could help me with the following:

I have a (1+1) scalar field decomposed into two different sets of modes. One set corresponds to a Minkowski frame in (t,x) coordinates, the other to a Rinder frame in conformal (##\tau,\bar{\xi}##) coordinates. I know that I need to calculate the bogoliubov coefficients using the Klein Gordon invariante inner product

##(\phi_1,\phi_2)=i\int dx(\phi_1^*\frac{\partial{\phi_2}}{\partial{dx^0}}-\frac{\partial{\phi_1^*}}{\partial{dx^0}}\phi_2)##

How should approach this calculation in my case, where the modes are expressed in different coordinates?

I am not after an easy answer, just some guidance, so thanks in advanced. Any references I could get some furthur reading would be great too! Anything that helps furthur my understanding of QFT.

Thanks again,

Joe.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried Birrell & Davies, sect 4.5?
 
Hi,

Thanks for the reply. I checked it out, but my problem is slightly different. The field is constrained to a Dirichlet box so I'm not sure it null coordinates are the most convenient for the problem, that's why I was going to try and compute the coefficients via de inner product.

I will give it another read.

Thanks again!
 
Joey21 said:
The field is constrained to a Dirichlet box
Not exactly sure what you mean.

Disclaimer: I have not worked through this (nor the ordinary Rindler space) problem pen-in-hand, but only skim-studied B&D. It could be worthwhile to work through this problem properly, if you have the stamina to type a lot more latex in detail...
 
OK, let me explain.

With a the filed being confined to a Dirichlet box I mean the field is constrained to a 1D box with boundary conditions such that the field is 0 at the edges.

I managed to calculate the integral, its as simple as using the chain rule when you calculate the derivative. I was overworked at the time of posting, so sorry for that.

Thanks again for the help.

P.S If anyone is interested I can type up or scan the solution.
 
Joey21 said:
If anyone is interested I can type up or scan the solution.
I am interested -- but I don't have much spare time for close study right now. I.e., I'd be interested in returning to this later, but I don't expect you to put excessive extra effort into this unless you feel inspired to do so... :oldbiggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K