QFT Cutting Rules: Improved Versions & Worked Examples

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on seeking references for improved versions of Cutkosky cutting rules in quantum field theory (QFT), particularly for extracting the absorptive or imaginary parts of loop diagrams. Suggestions include Itzykson and Zuber's work, which explains the rules, and a specific paper from arXiv:hep-ph/9709423 that discusses the gg→gH example. Participants acknowledge the thread's age but emphasize the value of reviving it for future readers who may benefit from the shared resources. Overall, the conversation highlights the ongoing interest in refining techniques related to cutting rules in QFT. Contributions to older threads can still provide significant insights for the community.
mjsd
Homework Helper
Messages
725
Reaction score
3
I am wondering whether someone can suggest a good ref or two (preferrably with worked example) on how to use Cutkosky (or whatever it is called) cutting rules in QFT to help pick out the absorptive/Imaginary part of a 1- or 2-loops diagrams. I have already tried Peskin and Schroeder, which is good only up to a certain level.

are there actually improved version of these cutting rules these days?

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi, maybe you can find somethig useful at Itzykson Zuber where the rule is explained...
You can also find some papres at hep-th and there are other refs at a previous post.
 
Hi,
Perhaps you can try arXiv:hep-ph/9709423. I haven't looked at it yet but it looks useful. The example given is gg→gH.
 
This thread is over 6 years old. I doubt the OP is still looking for help.
 
yeah. that's what i first thought, but i decided to reply anyway, for completeness. people googling cutkosky rules might find it of epsilon use.
 
I'll just add, I found the paper mentioned by peaelle42 to be very useful and informative. I don't think there should be anything wrong with reviving an old thread if one has something useful to add, and this was such a case (StackOverflow even gives a badge for answering old questions that are probably long-forgotten by the OP--it can still be useful to future readers).

(In the case of my comment here, incidentally also my first post on this form, I *do* apologize for yet again bumping an old thread.)
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top