QFT: Srednicki's Book: What Does a(x) Represent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hymne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qft
Hymne
Messages
87
Reaction score
1
Hello! I have a question conserning Srednicki´s book on QFT. On page 27 he introduces a quantum field a(x) and its h.c. .
What does this field represent? What should I think of when he uses this field?

He writes the hamiltionian on the regular form but multiplicates with a(x) and its h.c. and then integrates over all of space...

It seems to be creation and annihilation operators for particles, but i don't really see the reason for this method.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
He does give you a way to interpret the operators:

"Thus we can interpret the state |0⟩ as a state of “no particles”, the state
a† (x1 ) |0⟩ as a state with one particle at position x1 , the state a† (x1 )a† (x2 )|0⟩
as a state with one particle at position x1 and another at position x2 , and
so on."

But it does seem to me that Srednicki is rather weak here on motivation. I would suggest watching the first few of Sidney Coleman's QFT lectures. There are also some good notes here:

http://www.physics.utoronto.ca/~luke/PHY2403/References.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the point of this little demo is to make you work through a bit of operator algebra to see how a and a-dagger work algebraically, and how you can write a Hamiltonian in terms of creation and annihilation operators. In chapter 3 on quantization of scalar fields you get a derivation where these operators emerge naturally as important things.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top