QFT Time Ordering: Solve Mystery of Operator Rewriting

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qft Time
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I have asked this question once, but no one seemed to notice it, so I'll try again. In my book the time ordering operator is used to rewrite an operator product:

U(β,τ)A(τ)U(τ,τ')B(τ')U(τ',0) = T_τ(U(β,0)A(τ)B(τ'))

To refresh your memories the time ordering operator T_τ orders operators according to time such that:
T_τ(A(τ)B(τ')) = A(τ)B(τ') for τ>τ' and B(τ')A(τ) for τ'>τ
And the operator U(t,t') is a unitary operator that propagates a state from t' to t and has the property that:
U(t,t')=U(t,t'')U(t'',t')

I am still unsure how the rewriting is done though. One key ingredient is to use the property of the unitary above to write:
This way we have:
U(0,β)=U(0,τ')U(τ',τ)U(τ,β)
And i think the idea is then to insert in the expression and use time-order but I am not sure how to.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is an implicit assumption here that ##\beta>\tau>\tau'>0##.

Start with
T[U(\beta,0)A(\tau)B(\tau')]
Then substitute in
U(\beta,0)=U(\beta,\tau)U(\tau,\tau')U(\tau',0)
to get
T[U(\beta,\tau)U(\tau,\tau')U(\tau',0)A(\tau)B(\tau')]
Now rearrange the operators so that time labels decrease as you go left to right:
T[U(\beta,\tau)A(\tau)U(\tau,\tau')B(\tau')U(\tau',0)]
The labels are now in time-order, so the time-ordering symbol can be dropped:
U(\beta,\tau)A(\tau)U(\tau,\tau')B(\tau')U(\tau',0)
QED.
 
hmm okay I thought it was something like that, but I am still unsure though. Which time do you assing to the operator U(t1,t2)? It propagates a state from t1 to t2, so it is not really a function of one time - or am I missing something?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
aaaa202 said:
Which time do you assign to the operator U(t1,t2)?
You can think of it as a product of many operators at closely spaced times, and break it up as needed; this is what I did above.
 
So I should basically assign to U(t1,t2) a value of time between t1 and t2?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top