I QM - Ladder Operator QHO - factorization

JaneHall89
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi, quick question with A being the lowering operator and A the raising operator for a QHO

(A A - 1 + 1/2) ħω [Aψ] = A (A A - 1 + 1/2) ħω ψ

By taking out a factor of A. Why has the ordering of A A swapped around? I would have thought taking out a factor of A would leave it as

A (A - 1 + 1/2) ħω ψ

Jane
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is another A in [Aψ]. Pull this A into the bracket from the right to get (AAA - A + 1/2A). Now pull out A out to the left of the bracket.
 
  • Like
Likes JaneHall89
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top