Qq- ->qq- differential cross section and mandelstam variables

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the differential cross section for the qq- to qq- scattering process and the expression of Mandelstam variables in terms of the scattering angle θ. It highlights that the Mandelstam variables s, t, and u are related and that only two are independent due to the equation s + t + u = 4m². The massless limit is explained as the high-energy scenario where the masses of the particles become negligible compared to their momentum, specifically when E >> m. The scattering angle θ is defined in the center of mass frame, which simplifies the calculations of the Mandelstam variables. Overall, the discussion seeks clarity on the dependence of these variables on the specific scattering process and the implications of the massless limit.
helpcometk
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
qq- --->qq- differential cross section and mandelstam variables

Homework Statement


for the problem statement please look the attachement


Homework Equations


The problem is asking to express the mandelstam variables in temrs of the scattering angle θ.I would like to ask the quastion weather there varibles should depend on qq- --->qq- process or they are the same for any process A+B--->A+B ? And then what does it mean massless limit i.e WHICH masses become zero ?
It is not obvious from where i should start to calculate the mandslestam variables in terms of the scaterring angle.

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • MV.PNG
    MV.PNG
    11.9 KB · Views: 718
Physics news on Phys.org


I think you know about those s,t and u.you may also be aware of fact that only two of it are independent because of the relation
s+t+u=4m2
since everything is asked in cm frame,so it is easy.Because in rest frame as you can show
s=4E2=4(|p|2+m2)
t=-2|p|2(1-cosθ)
u=-2|p|2(1+cosθ),since |p|=|p'|
massless limit is also called high energy limit,in which E>>m,so you can neglect m in comparison to |p|.θ is scattering angle in CM system.
 


thanks
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top