Quadratic inequalities for complex variables?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of quadratic inequalities for complex variables, specifically addressing a problem from Riley's solution manual. It is established that if a quadratic polynomial P(z) = az² + bz + c has no real roots, then P(λ) > 0 for all real λ, indicating that λ is an arbitrary real number. The participants confirm that the roots of the polynomial must be either purely imaginary or complex, necessitating a negative discriminant to ensure the presence of imaginary components in the solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quadratic polynomials and their properties
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and their representation
  • Knowledge of the discriminant and its implications for roots
  • Basic principles of inequalities in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the discriminant in quadratic equations
  • Explore the behavior of quadratic functions in the complex plane
  • Learn about the relationship between real and complex roots in polynomials
  • Investigate advanced topics in complex analysis related to inequalities
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying complex analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of quadratic inequalities and their implications in higher mathematics.

mathsciguy
Messages
134
Reaction score
1
Hello, I was looking at Riley's solution manual for this specific problem. Along the way, he ended up with a quadratic inequality:

View attachment how.bmp

If you looked at the image, he said it is given that λ is real, but he asserted that λ has no real roots because of the inequality. Doesn't that mean λ is imaginary or complex in some points then, contradicting his first statement? I reckon this has something to do with the properties of a quadratic inequality for complex variables.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathsciguy said:
Hello, I was looking at Riley's solution manual for this specific problem. Along the way, he ended up with a quadratic inequality:

View attachment 61729

If you looked at the image, he said it is given that λ is real, but he asserted that λ has no real roots because of the inequality. Doesn't that mean λ is imaginary or complex in some points then, contradicting his first statement? I reckon this has something to do with the properties of a quadratic inequality for complex variables.

\lambda doesn't have roots; it's an arbitrary real number. The quadratic P: z \mapsto az^2 + bz + c has roots, which are those z \in \mathbb{C} for which P(z) = 0. The point is that if P(\lambda) > 0 for all real \lambda then P has no real roots, because if z is real then P(z) \neq 0 and z cannot be a root of P.
 
That's cool, I get it now. Then that means the roots are either purely imaginary or complex (but not purely real) right? Then why is it required that the discriminant be less than zero? Is it because it will make sure that part of the solution will have an imaginary part?
 
Last edited:
mathsciguy said:
That's cool, I get it now. Then that means the roots are either purely imaginary or complex (but not purely real) right? Then why is it required that the discriminant be less than zero? Is it because it will make sure that part of the solution will have an imaginary part?

Yes. A quadratic with real coefficients has no real roots if and only if the discriminant is negative.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K