Quantium Physics or Theorectial Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Radiatedtheory18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
Beta particles can be directed at alpha targets using particle accelerators, specifically by directing an electron beam at stationary helium ions. This method is preferred due to the significant mass difference between alpha and beta particles, making traditional colliders unsuitable for such interactions. Particle physics primarily utilizes electron-positron and proton-antiproton colliders to explore high-energy collisions, which produce a wide array of new particles. The collisions generate energy that manifests in numerous particles, allowing physicists to sift through the results to identify specific particles of interest, such as quarks or meson resonances. Additionally, heavy ion colliders like RHIC at Brookhaven are also significant in this field.
Radiatedtheory18
Beta particles can be targeted at a alpha target (negative vs positive). I was wondering that this can be done using a Particle accelerator. This guy i saw working on this was working with sub atomic particles quarks etc if I am correct? I was wondering what would be the reason this was being done? in physics terms of course
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure, you could smash alpha particles and beta particles together, but since the two particles have radically different masses, you wouldn't use a collider. You'd instead just direct an electron beam (beta ray) at a stationary sample of helium ions.

Particle physics is largely done with electron-positron colliders (LEP @ CERN) and proton-antiproton colliders (Tevatron @ Fermilab) these days.

The reason we collide particles is because the energy is manifested in lots of new particles -- say you smash a proton and an antiproton together -- you get out huge jets of (sometimes) thousands of particles. We sift through all the debris from hundreds of thousands of interactions to find the particles we want to find -- for example, a particular quark or meson resonance.

- Warren
 
Don't forget new heavy ion colliders, like RHIC at Brookhaven.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top