I Quantized Energy in micro scales

3dot
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Say you had a crystal lattice box on a micro scale. You can push it with a bigger piston to accelerate it. Say it's lying on a friction-less surface (or this happens in minimal gravity and vacuum).

My question is, would the possible kinetic energy that you can impart on this cube be quantized? Or is this a large scale free particle question? I.e. are there are kinetic energies as a whole that this box literally cannot assume?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm guessing by "bigger" piston you mean classical, right? Given that your box state will acquire momentum from a classical field, the centre of mass degree of freedom becomes delocalised without any further/external quantising boundary, by which I mean an external confining boundary which would discretise the allowable centre of mass momentum states. The centre of mass would then have a continuous range of accessible momentum states from ##-\infty## to ##+\infty##. This was for the case where the spring could move also. If the spring is fixed on one side, then the amplitude for momentum states become damped for higher ranges but they will still form a continuum given that the spring piston itself does not "jump" between states. All this is assuming you are talking about a classical spring/piston though. That would be my take on your thought experiment anyway.
 
Hmm.. came across something interesting after searching for related stuff. A paper came out a couple years ago relating to the system I think you had in mind: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.6354v2.pdf (Emergent Newtonian dynamics and the geometric origin of mass)
If you scroll down to around pg.20 you'll see the kind of systems you're talking about where they apparently find that the mass of the classical degree of freedom gets renormalised as it drags the quantum oscillators with it. Seems like an interesting paper which relates the emergence of mass at the classical limit to some distortion process of Hilbert space.
 
Yeah, the title and abstract seem to be what I am looking for, thanks. Now to actually study enough to understand it :D.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...

Similar threads

Back
Top