Quantum Communication, ion traps of thermoluminescent materials

sdwdd
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Recently I've came by this article:
"Intercontinental quantum liaisons between entangled electrons in ion traps of thermoluminescent crystals" by Robert Desbrandes and Daniel Van Gent
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0611109

Researchers used ion traps caused by imperfections of the crystals to "store" the entangled particles. Then they concluded an experiment in which one of the crystals was heated and the effect of this action was observed on the second crystal miles away. Their results show that such a communication really took place and was resistant to outside factors to a good extent.

That was really an inspiring reading for me.

But I was surprised that the paper was published in 2006 and during all these years no commercial solutions where built on this idea.

My question is why?
It looks trivial to build a protocol on top of the temperature changes to allow communication.

Can anyone uncover the downsides here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sdwdd said:
Recently I've came by this article:
"Intercontinental quantum liaisons between entangled electrons in ion traps of thermoluminescent crystals" by Robert Desbrandes and Daniel Van Gent
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0611109

Researchers used ion traps caused by imperfections of the crystals to "store" the entangled particles. Then they concluded an experiment in which one of the crystals was heated and the effect of this action was observed on the second crystal miles away. Their results show that such a communication really took place and was resistant to outside factors to a good extent.

That was really an inspiring reading for me.

But I was surprised that the paper was published in 2006 and during all these years no commercial solutions where built on this idea.

My question is why?
It looks trivial to build a protocol on top of the temperature changes to allow communication.

Can anyone uncover the downsides here?

Welcome to PhysicsForums, sdwdd!

Quantum entanglement, as demonstrated in the paper, does not allow for classical communication. It is easy to read it differently, but the effect is one which requires a traditional communication method to observe.

There have been a number of earlier tests of quantum communication using other more common techniques. So the paper you cited is not considered groundbreaking in that regard. For example:

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9810080
 
Is this to say that a binary signal (on/off blip on the graph) could be sent from one entangled crystal located 5 miles underground, to the paired crystal sitting in a vault in downtown DC - in an instant?
 
sdwdd said:
Recently I've came by this article:
"But I was surprised that the paper was published in 2006 and during all these years no commercial solutions where built on this idea.

My question is why?
It looks trivial to build a protocol on top of the temperature changes to allow communication.

Can anyone uncover the downsides here?

I have had contact with one of the authors fairly recently.
No downside mentioned.
The authors are pursuing patent protection.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top