Quantum Computing - good, active field?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the field of quantum computing, particularly its viability as a specialization and the necessary preparations for entering the field. Participants explore the current state of quantum computing, including its funding, scope, and educational pathways.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about quantum computing potentially being a "dead field" despite their interest in specializing in it.
  • Another participant notes that quantum computing, particularly in theory, is a smaller and underfunded field compared to other areas of physics, suggesting that it may remain that way without significant breakthroughs.
  • There is acknowledgment of many unanswered fundamental questions in quantum computing, indicating a dynamic aspect to the field.
  • Participants discuss the relevance of various educational courses, with one suggesting that while quantum mechanics classes are beneficial, they may not directly relate to quantum computing work.
  • Recommendations for preparatory materials include the book "Quantum Computer Science" by Mermin and relevant undergraduate courses in computer science and mathematics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the viability and scope of quantum computing as a field. While some highlight its potential and the presence of unanswered questions, others emphasize concerns about funding and the field's size.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the field's future may depend on breakthroughs and that the relevance of certain educational courses can vary based on individual backgrounds.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in pursuing a career in quantum computing, especially those with backgrounds in computer science or physics, may find this discussion relevant.

Dragonfall
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
5
Quantum Computing -- good, active field?

I had the chance of working in the summer on quantum cryptography. Unfortunately I was rather isolated so I didn't get a good sense of the scope of the field. Now I want to specialize in it, but I fear it might lead to a dead field. Any advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hey Dragonfall,

I'm also thinking about getting into quantum computing (theory), and as far as I can tell it's a smaller field than most (in terms of both people & funding). As it is, CS theory in general is rather underfunded as compared to most fields in physics. Barring some breakthrough it's likely to stay that way for a while. However, there are a ton of unanswered fundamental questions since it's a rather new field. If you want to get a sense of where the field is you could check out the bigger quantum computing groups @ Berkeley, MIT, UCSB, UW, and the Perimeter Institute to name a few. http://scottaaronson.com/blog/" also has a lot of information on the state of things in the quantum computing world.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Thanks. But how does one prepare for quantum computation? The only related class here is "quantum cryptography". Should I take some quantum physics class from physics department?
 


Well, it depends on your background. The book Quantum Computer Science by Mermin is a good intro to the subject written for people with a CS background. Taking quantum mechanics classes certainly won't hurt (I would even recommend it!), but most of the material you'll see won't be very relevant to quantum computing. You won't be diagonalizing too many Hamiltonians if you work in quantum computing (however knowing why you'd want to is still important).

I'd say the most relevant undergrad classes would probably be normal CS theory courses like complexity theory and cryptography as well as certain math courses like advanced linear algebra, combinatorics, and probability.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K