Quantum - determine reflection coefficient

wood
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I am working through a past exam paper and this one has me stumped

1. Homework Statement

Consider a particle of mass m with kinetic energy E incident from the left upon a
step-up potential:

$$U(x)=\begin{cases} 0 & \quad \text{for } x <0\\ V & \quad \text{for } x>0\\ \end{cases} $$

assuming V > 0. Assume that E > V .

(a) For the two distinct regions, write down the relevant time-independent Schrodinger ¨
equation in the form

$$\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}=-k^2\psi$$where k is real. Clearly specify the values of k^2 in each region, using kL to
represent the value of k to the left of the step, and kR to represent the value of k to
the right of the step. For each case, write down the general solution of the
Schrodinger equation in terms of real or complex exponentials.

(b) Impose the relevant boundary conditions for this system.

(c) Solve your boundary conditions to show that the reflection coefficient is given by
$$R=\left(\frac{k_R-k_L}{k_R+k_L}\right)^2$$

[3]
(d) Obtain a formula for the transmission coefficient. How does it differ from that
obtained in the classical case?

Homework Equations



TISE and ##R=|\frac{B}{A}|^2##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
So I can get my equations for part a
$$\psi_L(x)=Ae^{ik_Lx}+Be^{-ik_Lx}$$
$$\psi_L(x)=Ce^{ik_Lx}+De^{-ik_Lx}$$
D=0 as there is no reflected wave on x>0 so
$$\psi_L(x)=Ce^ik_Lx$$
and impose the boundary conditions at x=0 for part be and get
$$\psi_L(0)=\psi_R(0) $$
$$A+B=C$$
and
$$\psi'_L(0)=\psi'_R(0) $$
$$ik_L(A-B)=ik_RC$$
$$ C=\frac{k_L(A-B)}{k_R}=A+B$$
And this is where it all goes wrong. I cannot get from there to $$\frac{B}{A}=\left(\frac{k_R-k_L}{k_R+k_L}\right)$$
I end up with ## \left(\frac{k_L-k_R}{k_R+k_L}\right)## when I try to compute B/A. Is there another way to solve the boundary conditions for the reflection coefficient that gets the correct answer?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You did get the correct answer ...
 
Orodruin said:
You did get the correct answer ...
No, I keep getting kL-kR when I try to solve for A and B algebraically.
 
What happens when you square a negative number?
 
I get a positive number so I thnk I might be an idiot and have had the correct answer all along...ie
$$\left(\frac{k_R-k_L}{k_R+k_L}\right)^2=\left(\frac{k_L-k_R}{k_R+k_L}\right)^2$$
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top