B Quantum field theory and the collapse of the wave function

Joao
Messages
80
Reaction score
8
Hi everyone! Sorry for the bad english!

So, just a quick doubt... Does things collapse from a wave of probability into a quantum field or is the wave in the quantum field the probabilistic wave itself?

An example to make it clearer:
Suppose we have an atom, it enters an atom interferometer, it takes both paths simultaneously and exists into one exit or the other...

So, when its traveling inside the interferometer, is its travel represented as an wave in its various fields (like the up quark field, the down quark field) and this wave is a probabilistic wave or does the atom stops being represented as waves in the quantum fields to be represented as a probabilistic wave, and when its measured it collapses into the quantum field?

Thanks! =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Joao said:
Does things collapse from a wave of probability into a quantum field or is the wave in the quantum field the probabilistic wave itself?
neither. State vectors (which are wave functions in the simplest cases only) collapse to other state vectors, and are very different objects from quantum fields.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Joao and AlexCaledin
A. Neumaier said:
neither. State vectors (wave functions in the simplest cases only) collapse to other state vectors, and are very different objects from quantum fields.

Thanks a lot for the answer! Now that's a possibility I didn't considered and, to be honest, I don't fully understand! I'll try to look more into what you just said! Thanks!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top