Is the Potential in Quantum Hamiltonian II Always Real?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the potential V in the Hamiltonian H = T + V is necessarily real if the energies E_n and E_k are related as E*_n = E_k. The argument presented uses normalized eigenfunctions to show that the expected value of the kinetic energy T is real, leading to the conclusion that the complex part of the potential, b(x), must equal zero. This implies that V is real, resulting in all eigenfunctions being real as well. Additionally, it is noted that if V were non-real, H would not be Hermitian, contradicting the requirement for energy eigenvalues to be real. The conclusion emphasizes that the nature of the Hamiltonian ensures real eigenvalues when V is real.
eljose
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
Let be a Hamiltonian in the form H=T+V we don,t know if V is real or complex..all we know is that if E_n is an energy also E*_n=E_k will be another energy, my question is if this would imply V is real...

my proof is taking normalized Eigenfunctions we would have that:

(<\phi_{n}|H|\phi_{n}>)*=<\phi_{k}|H|\phi_{k}>

so the expected value of T is always real,then we would have the identity with the complex part b(x) of the potential:

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx(|\phi_{n}|^{2}+|\phi_{k}|^{2})b(x)=0

for every k,and n so necessarily b=0 so the potential is real and all the eigenfunctions would be real.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I find the question a bit weird. The energy of a system is an observable and its corresponding operator is the Hamiltonian and is thus hermitian which implies having real eigenvalues. If you take V nonreal H isn't Hermitian anymore.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top