Quantum Mechanics - Addition of Angular Momentum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the addition of angular momentum in quantum mechanics, specifically addressing a problem related to the possible values of total angular momentum (J) and its projection (M) for two systems with j=1. Participants explore the implications of these values and the construction of corresponding quantum states.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the allowed values for J and M, questioning the original poster's understanding of the states involved. There is an exploration of the application of angular momentum operators and the implications of the Pauli exclusion principle in the context of identical versus non-identical particles.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing clarifications on the allowed states for J and M, and addressing the original poster's confusion regarding the application of operators. There is a productive exchange regarding the nature of identical particles and the symmetry of their wave functions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of quantum mechanics, particularly the addition of angular momentum and the implications of particle identity on state construction. The original problem references specific values and states that are central to the discussion.

Tangent87
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Just when I think I've understood addition of angular momentum, I find a problem that completely questions everything I think I know. Okay so here's the problem: question 3/II/32D on page 68 http://www.maths.cam.ac.uk/undergrad/pastpapers/2005/Part_2/list_II.pdf .

For the possible values of J and M as I understand it, j_1+j_2\geq J\geq|j_1-j_2|,~j_1+j_2\geq M\geq-(j_1+j_2) and therefore for two j=1 systems surely J=2,1, or 0 and M=-2,-1,0,1,2?

Thus we must find expressions for the states |1~ 2\rangle ,~|1 ~1\rangle ,~|1 ~0\rangle ,~|1 ~-1\rangle ,~and |1 ~-2\rangle ,~?

So letting |1~m_1\rangle |1~m_2\rangle=|m_1\rangle|m_2\rangle where m_i=\pm 1, we start with the top state J=2:

|2~2\rangle=|1\rangle|1\rangle

Then apply J_- to get |2~ 1\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle|1\rangle+|1\rangle|0\rangle).

Orthog. combination gives us a J=1 state: |1 ~1\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle|1\rangle-|1\rangle|0\rangle). But if we try and apply J_+ to this in order to get |1 ~2\rangle we just get zero, why? How do we get |1 ~2\rangle?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Tangent87 said:
Just when I think I've understood addition of angular momentum, I find a problem that completely questions everything I think I know. Okay so here's the problem: question 3/II/32D on page 68 http://www.maths.cam.ac.uk/undergrad/pastpapers/2005/Part_2/list_II.pdf .

For the possible values of J and M as I understand it, j_1+j_2\geq J\geq|j_1-j_2|,~j_1+j_2\geq M\geq-(j_1+j_2) and therefore for two j=1 systems surely J=2,1, or 0 and M=-2,-1,0,1,2?
That's not quite correct. First you find the allowed values for J. Then for each value of J, M runs from -J to +J. So for this problem, since you're interested in J=1, you only have the states |1 1>, |1 0>, and |1 -1>. There are no other J=1 states (so it should make sense to you why you got 0 when you applied J+ below).
Thus we must find expressions for the states |1~ 2\rangle ,~|1 ~1\rangle ,~|1 ~0\rangle ,~|1 ~-1\rangle ,~and |1 ~-2\rangle ,~?

So letting |1~m_1\rangle |1~m_2\rangle=|m_1\rangle|m_2\rangle where m_i=\pm 1, we start with the top state J=2:

|2~2\rangle=|1\rangle|1\rangle

Then apply J_- to get |2~ 1\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle|1\rangle+|1\rangle|0\rangle).

Orthog. combination gives us a J=1 state: |1 ~1\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle|1\rangle-|1\rangle|0\rangle). But if we try and apply J_+ to this in order to get |1 ~2\rangle we just get zero, why? How do we get |1 ~2\rangle?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
vela said:
That's not quite correct. First you find the allowed values for J. Then for each value of J, M runs from -J to +J. So for this problem, since you're interested in J=1, you only have the states |1 1>, |1 0>, and |1 -1>. There are no other J=1 states (so it should make sense to you why you got 0 when you applied J+ below).

Ah I see, yes that makes sense. Also I don't understand the second paragraph of the question, I guess I need to understand what's the difference between identical and non-identical particles?
 
Right. It has to do with the Pauli exclusion principle and the symmetry of the wave function.
 
vela said:
Right. It has to do with the Pauli exclusion principle and the symmetry of the wave function.

Ok I have read this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identical_particles and I think I'm starting to understand. So if the particles are identical the state must be symmetric since the antisymmetric state would be zero. And if the particles are non-identical the state can be either symmetric or anti-symmetric? Is that logic correct?
 
Yes, that's right.
 
vela said:
Yes, that's right.

So then how do we construct the states, we're given \psi_i(x) and told that we have to construct states of lowest energy (i.e. E_1) so do we only care about \psi_1^A(x) and \psi_1^B(x)?
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K