Quantum Mechanics algebra - complex analysis

sxc656
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I cannot work out how the working shown in the attached pic is well, er worked out!:confused:
Could someone explain the ins and outs of the complex analysis of taking the real or imaginary parts of some formula, for example in the context of the my case.
 

Attachments

  • l13.JPG
    l13.JPG
    12.7 KB · Views: 558
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that e^{ix}= cos(x) + isin(x). Taking the imaginary part means you're looking at just the sine part. When you combine into that integral form, the solution is simpler.
 
Pengwuino said:
Remember that e^{ix}= cos(x) + isin(x). Taking the imaginary part means you're looking at just the sine part. When you combine into that integral form, the solution is simpler.

Is this what you mean, i am not sure about the last two lines of working.
 

Attachments

  • 13a.jpg
    13a.jpg
    17.4 KB · Views: 510
You can write

sin pr = Im(e^{ipr})

Because Im(z+w) = Im(z)+Im(w) and Im(az) = aIm(z) for real a, you can pull the other exponential in as well as reverse the order of I am and the integral.
 
Thanks to all:approve:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top