Quantum mechanics - born approximation algebra

sxc656
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi, I get an a^4 whilst the answer has an a^2. Where am i going wrong? Is the delta function throwing a spanner in my work?

see attachments for question/equations and my attempt.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • q13q.JPG
    q13q.JPG
    8.9 KB · Views: 491
  • q13a.JPG
    q13a.JPG
    25.5 KB · Views: 536
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your calculation is correct with the a^4. If you check the units in your answer (with p having units of distance^-1.. since it should really be k instead of p), you correctly get units of area. The whole calculation looks ok to me.
 
pellman said:
I think your calculation is correct with the a^4. If you check the units in your answer (with p having units of distance^-1.. since it should really be k instead of p), you correctly get units of area. The whole calculation looks ok to me.

Thanks:)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top