Quantum Mechanics: Expectation values

Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



I need to find the expectation value for E but I don't know how b acts on the vacuum state.

Homework Equations


<br /> b = \int dt \phi^{*}(t) \hat{{\cal E}}_{in}(t)<br />
<br /> | \psi(t)\rangle = b^\dagger| 0\rangle<br />



The Attempt at a Solution


<br /> \langle \psi(t) | \hat{{\cal E}}^\dagger\hat{{\cal E}}| \psi(t)\rangle =<br /> <br />
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What did I not make clear?
 
Nusc said:
What did I not make clear?

Everything! What is the system supposed to be? How are your operators and other variables defined? Are you integrating over time? Then how is it that the state is time dependent? What exactly are you supposed to compute the expectation value of?
 
This represents the single photon output level and I'm supposed to determine the
mean value and standard deviation of the single photon amplitude.
<br /> \hat{{\cal E}} = e^{-\kappa \tau}+ e^{-\kappa t}\int^{t}_{0}e^{\kappa \tau} \sqrt{2\kappa}\, \hat{{\cal E}}_{in}(\tau)dt<br />

I'm integrating with respect to time.

<br /> {\cal E}<br />is an operator in Heisenberg picture.

b^+ creates a photon in the temporal mode \phi(t)

Does that make sense?
 
Sorry, it does not make sense to me. Perhaps someone else will be able to help.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top