Quantum Mechanics - Induction Method

izzmach
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Let a be a lowering operator and a† be a raising operator.

Prove that a((a†)^n) = n (a†)^(n-1)

Professor suggested to use induction method with formula:

((a†)(a) + [a,a†]) (a†)^(n-1)

But before start applying induction method, I would like to know where the given formula comes from. Someone please explain it briefly? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If ##a## is a lowering operator and ##a^\dagger##
They are also known as "ladder" operators ... because ##a## means "go down one step" and ##a^\dagger## means "go up one step".
##(a^\dagger)^n## means "go up n steps"... and so on.
##a(a^\dagger)## means "go up one step then go down one" (operators work right-to-left).

Therefore the formula ##a(a^\dagger)^n = n(a^\dagger)^{(n-1)}## means ...
 
izzmach said:
Let a be a lowering operator and a† be a raising operator.
Prove that a((a†)^n) = n (a†)^(n-1)
[...]
You also have a https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/quantum-mechanics-lowering-operator.820823/[/url , so this discussion should probably continue there.

In any case, I think you have not stated the problem question accurately. (In general, it is "commutation by ##A##" which can be interpreted as "differentiation by ##A^\dagger##". Your formula only applies if the expression acts on a vacuum state ##|0\rangle## which is annihilated by ##A##.)

There is a reason why the homework guidelines emphasize that you must state the question exactly as given, and also write out relevant equations (in this case, the commutation relation between ##A## and ##A^\dagger##).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top