(Quantum Mechanics) Infinite Square Well

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on normalizing the wave function for a particle in an infinite square well, specifically the function Ψ(x,0) = Ax(a-x). The initial attempt at normalization led to an incorrect constant A, with the correct normalization constant being A = √(2/a) for sine functions, which differs from the polynomial form used here. A participant clarifies that the integral limits for the wave function should be set from 0 to a, as the wave function is zero outside this range. Additionally, there is a related query about proving the orthogonality of wave functions, which also highlights the importance of correct limits in integration. The conversation emphasizes understanding the specific wave function forms and their respective normalization conditions.
emol1414
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm stuck in this Griffiths' Introduction to QM problem (#2.8)

Homework Statement


A particle in the infinite square well has the initial wave function

\Psi(x,0) = Ax(a-x)

Normalize \Psi(x,0)


Homework Equations


\int_{0}^{a} |\Psi(x)|^2 dx = 1


The Attempt at a Solution


Haha, this is supposed to be the least of my problems but... doing

A^2 \int_{0}^{a} x^2 (a-x)^2 dx = 1
gives us A = \sqrt{\frac{30}{a^5}}.

When the correct answer is A = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}. I have no clue what I did wrong...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The normalization constant A = sqrt(2/a) is appropriate for ψ(x) = A sin(nπx/a). Here you have ψ(x) = Ax(a-x). Different wavefunctions have different normalization constants.
 
Kuruman... indeed A = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} is appropriate for \psi as a sin function. But when checking the result i got, i found this solution for the exact same problem:

http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/6186/64732846.jpg

The integral limit is set to 0,a/2... I'm not sure why, and if this is correct. For now i'll stick with my solution

_____________________________________________________________________________
By the way... (a correlated problem) trying to prove that: \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi_n^*(x) \psi_m (x) dx = \delta_{n,m} (Kronecker delta).

For n = m, and \psi_n (x) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} sin(\frac{n \pi x}{a}),\in \Re, I'm coming up with

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi_{n}^{2}(x) dx = \frac{-1}{a} cos(\frac{n\pi x}{a}) sin(\frac{n\pi x}{a})|_{-\infty}^{\infty} + \frac{1}{a} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx

The first term goes to 0, but the second would result in 1 for like... \int_{0}^{a}, not \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}. Again... where am I messing up?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
emol1414 said:
Kuruman... indeed A = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} is appropriate for \psi as a sin function. But when checking the result i got, i found this solution for the exact same problem:

http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/6186/64732846.jpg

The integral limit is set to 0,a/2... I'm not sure why, and if this is correct. For now i'll stick with my solution
It is not the exact same problem. The problem above has yet a third wavefunction that is constant for 0≤x≤a/2 and zero everywhere else. That is the reason why the upper limit is set at a/2. If you extend the integral beyond a/2, you will be adding a whole bunch of zeroes since ψ(x) is zero, so you might as well use a/2 for the upper limit.

By the way... (a correlated problem) trying to prove that: \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi_n^*(x) \psi_m (x) dx = \delta_{n,m} (Kronecker delta).

For n = m, and \psi_n (x) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} sin(\frac{n \pi x}{a}),\in \Re, I'm coming up with

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi_{n}^{2}(x) dx = \frac{-1}{a} cos(\frac{n\pi x}{a}) sin(\frac{n\pi x}{a})|_{-\infty}^{\infty} + \frac{1}{a} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx

The first term goes to 0, but the second would result in 1 for like... \int_{0}^{a}, not \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}. Again... where am I messing up?
Here I assume that you are using particle-in-the-box wavefunctions. All of them are zero for x≤0 and x≥a. What do you think your limits of integration ought to be?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hmm, ok! So it's a different problem

It makes sense now, I forgot the conditions... You're right, it is \int_{0}^{a}!
Thank you
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top