Quantum mechanics, vectorrepresentation

AI Thread Summary
To find the constants c1, c2, and c3 in the given function, normalization is the only condition provided, which results in a single equation involving all three constants. This leads to an infinite number of solutions, indicating that additional constraints are necessary to uniquely determine the constants. Utilizing the Jy-matrix and its eigenvalues, as well as the known operators J+, J-, and Jz, may provide further insights or relationships to help solve for the constants. The discussion emphasizes the need for more information or conditions to arrive at a specific solution. Ultimately, the goal is to achieve a normalized vector that satisfies the requirements of the quantum mechanics framework.
Kentaxel
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For the function

\chi^{(y)}=c_{1}<br /> <br /> \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> -1\\<br /> i\sqrt{2}\\<br /> 1\end{array} \right)<br /> +<br /> <br /> c_{2}<br /> <br /> \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1\\<br /> 0\\<br /> 1\end{array} \right)<br /> +<br /> c_{3}<br /> <br /> \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> -1\\<br /> -i\sqrt{2}\\<br /> 1\end{array} \right)<br />

how would i go on about finding the constants, is this enough information or is something missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only condition on the vector is to be normalized. This won't provide you with nothing but a condition involving all 3 constants altogether. There is an infinite number of solutions.
 
So what do i need to find them? I got the vectors from the Jy-matrix and its eigenvalues, could i use this somehow? I also know J+, J-, Jz and the eigenvectors/values for the (chi)z, could this be usefull? I can't figure out how to put it together but the full solution requires a normalized vector.
 
Solution to what?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top