I Can we find a quantum analogue of the Bertrand paradox?

jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
I considered a quantum version of the problem

There is one winning position so the initial state is |100>+|010>+|001> divided by sqrt3

Suppose the presentator opens door 3 the intermediate state is then a mixture

Cos a|100>+sin a|010>

We suppose finally the player chooses door 2 hence the end state were |010>

Going through those steps we can compute the probabilities pi*pf=(cos a+sin a)^2/3*sin^2 a

We find the extremas to be .06 up to .48

How to interprete those probabilities ? Does it mean that the game can be won only 48% of the time and hence it would be a lucrative game for the presentator ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jk22 said:
Suppose the presentator opens door 3
What does that mean quantum mechanically?

jk22 said:
the intermediate state is then a mixture

Cos a|100>+sin a|010>
Where do the cos and sin come from?
 
It probably means that now we have the knowledge its 1 in door 1 or 2 hence the first two superposed states.

The cos and sin are unknown coefficient that will be found afterwards for the presentator to choose where to put the 1 ?
 
jk22 said:
It probably means that now we have the knowledge its 1 in door 1 or 2 hence the first two superposed states.
I don't understand how you can do that. What measurement are you doing?

jk22 said:
The cos and sin are unknown coefficient that will be found afterwards for the presentator to choose where to put the 1 ?
Again, how do you do that? What kind of manipulation are you making on the quantum state?
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top