Quantum State Evolution of a Free Particle at a Defined Position

bluesunday
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
The question is: what is the quantum state of a free particle t time after its detection at the position r0 in t=0?

I know I have to use the evolution operator with the hamiltonian of a free particle. My actual problem is more stupid than that: I don't really know how to express the STATE of a free particle of well defined position (r0 in t=0, in this case)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If we know exactly the position of the particle at t=0, does this mean that at this time its state is an eigenstate of position, with eigenvalue r0? How can I put that into:

[URL]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/1/0/3/10317da44bf13fbd709cd642c5143b9f.png[/URL]

Should I just skip Dirac notation and work with wavefuncions? I don't know... Please help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd work in the momentum basis for this problem.

The wave function for a free particle at a definite position is a delta function.

Fourier transform this wavefunction into momentum space and then time evolve. It should be straightforward in the momentum basis.

If you need your answer in position space, then you can always Fourier transform back.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top