Quantum transmission resonances

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analysis of quantum transmission resonances, specifically addressing the condition where no reflected wave occurs at the first transmission resonance defined by E=U_0+(\frac{\pi^2 h^2}{2mL^2}). Participants explore the continuity conditions and equations necessary to demonstrate that B=0, where B represents the amplitude of the reflected wave. The continuity conditions include equations relating the amplitudes and wave numbers of the incident, reflected, and transmitted waves. A more straightforward approach is suggested, involving the evaluation of k' at the transmission resonance to simplify the equations and confirm that B=0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, particularly wave-particle duality
  • Familiarity with potential barriers in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of continuity conditions in wave functions
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation of complex equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of quantum transmission resonances in detail
  • Learn about the implications of potential barriers in quantum tunneling
  • Explore the mathematical techniques for solving wave equations in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the significance of the wave function continuity conditions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists focusing on wave-particle interactions, and researchers studying quantum tunneling phenomena.

b2386
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Here is my question:

In the E>U_0 potential barrier, there should be no reflected wave when the incident wave is at one of the transmisson resonances. Assuming that a beam of particles is incident at the first transmission resonance, E=U_0+(\frac{\pi^2 h^2}{2mL^2}), combine the continuity conditions to show that B=0. Here are the continuity conditions:

1st A+B=C+D

2nd k(A- B)=k^{'}(C-D)

3rd Ce^{ik^{'}L}+De^{-ik^{'}L}=Fe^{ikL}

4th k^{'}(Ce^{ik^{'}L}-De^{-ik^{'}L})=kFe^{ikL}

A couple more equations that we already know are k=\sqrt{\frac{2mE}{h^2}} and k^'=\sqrt{\frac{2m(E-U_0)}{h^2}

Here is my attempted solution:

I divided the 4th equation by K and then set equation 3 and 4 equal to each other. I then used the new equation to solve for C in terms of D giving me

C=De^{-2i \pi}\frac{k^{'}+k}{k^{'}-K} where I substituted \frac{\pi}{L} in for k'.

I substituted this result into the first equation to now give me

A+B={De^{-2i \pi}\frac{k^{'}+k}{k^{'}-K} + D.

Solving for D gives me

\frac{A+B}{e^{-2i \pi}\frac{k^{'}+k}{k^{'}-K} + 1} = D

Now, plugging in our solutions for D and C into the 2nd equation

\frac{(A+B)e^{-2i \pi}\frac{k^{'}+k}{k^{'}-K}}{e^{-2i \pi}\frac{k^{'}+k}{k^{'}-K}+1}-\frac{A+B}{e^{-2i \pi}\frac{k^{'}+k}{k^{'}-K}+1}=\frac{k}{k^{'}}(A-B})

At this point, it seems impossible to simplify the equation to a point where it is obvious that B = 0. Am I on the right track or is there an easier way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is an easier way. :smile:

I see that you've already evaluated k' at the transmission resonance. Plug this value into your 3rd and 4th equations and get rid of the exponentials on the left side. You should see that the left side of these two now look similar to the right side of your first two equations, and a little algebra should give you B=0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K