Quarks to Infinity: How Many Quarks Before Space Shrinks?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tionis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Quarks
tionis
Gold Member
Messages
459
Reaction score
67
If I toss a single, composite particle toward a gravitational singularity, would the quarks inside it be tidally rip apart from their confinement with enough energy to create another pair of quarks? And if so, how many times can that process happen before space gets small enough so that confinement is restored? In other words, how many quarks would be created from that single, original hadron before the space shrinks enough for the process to stop?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What we are looking at is the interaction between QM and GR ... which would strictly need a theory of quantum gravity.
So it's the kind of question researchers are interested in.

Which means we'll need some idea about your education level to know how to pitch any possible answers.

Meantime, some things to consider:
1. quarks are not well understood in terms of classical particles.
2. there are already lots of quarks in each hadron or meson ... we see the net effect as 2 or 3 quarks.
3. the "singularity" of a black hole is a quirk of the mathematics rather than a physical object - you are more interested in the region close to the event horizon, and you'd need a pretty small black hole to get the gradient to produce tides in the range of the strong nuclear force over the dimensions of a single particle.

It will help to narrow it down a bit ... let's pick the simplest composite: a meson ...
There are papers on this, i.e.
Zomorrodian M.E. et al. (2010) The stability of mesons near the event horizon of a black hole [IJPS Vol.5(7) pp1050-3 ]
... which may go some way to approaching your question.
 
Hmm.. It appears to be more complicated than I thought, and my knowledge of Physics is amateurish. But thanks anyways, Simon :)
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top