Quartic Oscillator: Solving for Time T to Reach Max Amplitude

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZoroP
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillators
ZoroP
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The equation of motion for a particle of mass 1 in a quartic oscillator V(x)=0.25x^4 is x''+x^3=0. Suppose that the maximum amplitude of the oscillator is Xm(max). Find an expression for the time T that it takes to go from x=0 to x=Xm(max) and show that this time is inversely proportional to Xm(max).

Homework Equations



Xm(max) = sqrt(x^2+mv^2/k)

The Attempt at a Solution



V(x) is energy? E = 0.5mv^2 + V then d^2/dt^2(x) = -x^3 ? How to make the connection between the time T and these equations. Thanks very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi ZoroP! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
ZoroP said:
The equation of motion for a particle of mass 1 in a quartic oscillator V(x)=0.25x^4 is x''+x^3=0.

V(x) is energy? …

Hint: multiply by x' to give x'x'' + x3x' = 0, and then integrate. :wink:
 
Thx tiny, then i get v*dv/dt + x^3 dx/dt = 0
how to integral this? is this the same with v*dv = - x^3 dx?
 
Hi ZoroP! :smile:

(just got up … :zzz:)

(please use the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
ZoroP said:
Thx tiny, then i get v*dv/dt + x^3 dx/dt = 0
how to integral this? is this the same with v*dv = - x^3 dx?

Yes, they're the same …

so what do you get? :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top