I Quasar Number Densities and Lifetimes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on estimating the total number of quasars observable at any given time, based on the estimated 40 billion galaxies in the universe and their average age of 10 billion years. Each galaxy is assumed to undergo one AGN episode lasting about 100 million years, leading to a calculation that suggests around 432 quasars visible at once. However, participants raise concerns about the clarity of the term "that we can see at anyone time," noting factors like obstruction from the Milky Way and uneven quasar distribution. Additionally, it's highlighted that not all active galactic nuclei qualify as quasars. The conversation emphasizes the complexities involved in such estimations.
aurora7790
From deep galaxy counts, it is estimated that there are about 40 billion galaxies in the observable universe (not including probable multitudes of dwarf galaxies too faint to observe). Assuming that the mean age of these galaxies is 10 Gyr, and that each one goes through an AGN episode once, with a mean duration of 108 yr, estimate the total number of quasars that we can see at anyone time.

This was an interesting question that my astronomy professor asked our class the other day, just wanted to see what others came up with!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
aurora7790 said:
From deep galaxy counts, it is estimated that there are about 40 billion galaxies in the observable universe (not including probable multitudes of dwarf galaxies too faint to observe). Assuming that the mean age of these galaxies is 10 Gyr, and that each one goes through an AGN episode once, with a mean duration of 108 yr, estimate the total number of quasars that we can see at anyone time.

This was an interesting question that my astronomy professor asked our class the other day, just wanted to see what others came up with!

(4 x 1010/1 x 1010) x 108 = 432

Did you mean 108 instead of 108? In that case 4 x 108

Is also unclear what "that we can see at anyone time" means. Large parts of the sky are blocked by the milky way or other galaxies, stars, and clouds. It will also be an uneven distribution. Not a random distribution of quasars in any time window over 10 billion years.

Not all active galactic nuclei are quasars.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top