Quaternion derivative ambiguity

softec17
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In Quaternions and Rotation Sequences by Jack B. Kuipers (pg. 264-265)
the quaternion derivative is defined as:

\frac{dq}{dt}=q(t)\overline{\omega}(t)

But in many published papers, I have seen the derivative defined instead as

\frac{dq}{dt}=\frac{1}{2}q(t)\omega(t)

Why is there a discrepancy? Is there some nomenclature that is different. I am assuming \omega(t) to be the angular velocity of the body axis wrt the fixed frame and the quaternion is used to transform a vector from the fixed frame to the body frame.

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably the two definitions of \omega differ by the factor of 2.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top