Query regarding to the frame of reference

AI Thread Summary
The metallic ball inside the rotating hollow top experiences constant acceleration due to the rotation. This means that the frame of reference from which the ball appears to be at rest is non-inertial. As the top rotates, the ball's motion is influenced by the forces acting on it, confirming its non-inertial status. Consequently, the ball is indeed in a non-inertial frame of reference. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing motion in rotating systems.
aditya ver.2.0
Messages
67
Reaction score
4
If a metallic ball is place inside a giant hollow top, and the top starts to rotate. Along with the top, the metallic ball will also start to rotate. Thus my question is the ball motion is under inertial frame of reference or non-inertial ?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    10 KB · Views: 401
Physics news on Phys.org
If the metallic ball is rotating, a frame of reference where the ball is not moving is non-intertial.
 
Means is the ball under non-inertial frame of reference?
 
aditya ver.2.0 said:
Means is the ball under non-inertial frame of reference?

The ball is under constant acceleration, therefor it is in a non-inertial frame of reference.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
51
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top