B Question about a beam of light

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mosio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Light
Mosio
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I can't understand this term. Specially a beam of white light. Is it a combination of photons or electromagnetic waves that moving in space with different wavelengths?
Since output of a prism is analogous transition of colors that makes me think there are infinite number of wavelengths in visible light in contrast to a laser beam. Much like infinite numbers between two numbers in math but how's the physical translation? Cuz numbers don't exist but light do. What am I missing here?
Thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mosio said:
I can't understand this term. Specially a beam of white light. Is it a combination of photons or electromagnetic waves that moving in space with different wavelengths?
yes
Since output of a prism is analogous transition of colors that makes me think there are infinite number of wavelengths in visible light in contrast to a laser beam.
yes
Much like infinite numbers between two numbers in math but how's the physical translation?
huh? The physical translation is exactly what you just said ... light can have an infinite range of frequencies.
Cuz numbers don't exist but light do.
so?
What am I missing here?
You don't seem to be missing anything other than confidence that you understand it.
 
phinds said:
light can have an infinite range of frequencies.
phinds said:
so?
So this means infinite amount of waves, photons and thus energy. how can we simply measure it and say e.g. it's n lux?
And how will the waveform look like?
 
Mosio said:
I can't understand this term. Specially a beam of white light. Is it a combination of photons or electromagnetic waves that moving in space with different wavelengths
It is an electromagnetic wave moving through space. Photons don't come into the picture until the light beam hits something and we need to do detailed calculations about exactly how the electromagnetic waves exchange energy and momentum with whatever they've hit.
Since output of a prism is analogous transition of colors that makes me think there are infinite number of wavelengths in visible light in contrast to a laser beam. Much like infinite numbers between two numbers in math but how's the physical translation? Cuz numbers don't exist but light do. What am I missing here?
All waves - not just electromagnetic, but also sound waves, water waves in the ocean, the waves in a violin string, vibrations in a tuning fork, whatever - behave according to particular differential equation called the "wave equation". The wave equation is linear, meaning that it has the very nice property that if A and B are solutions of the wave equation, then A+B is also a solution. Furthermore, a pure wave with a specific wavelength is always a solution so any waveform, no matter how complex, can be treated as a bunch of different pure single-wavelength waves all moving through the same point in space at the same time, adding in ways that produce the actual physical waveform that we're working with. And it turns out that a beam of ordinary white ligtht is produced by summing waves at all possible wavelengths, so yes... There really are an infinite number of wavelengths in a beam of ordinary white light, and that's why prisms produce a continuous spectrum.
 
  • Like
Likes Mosio
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
207
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top