Question about a question about Ch 1 physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter LearninDaMath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the frustration of users seeking answers to specific vector manipulation questions, noting a lack of responses despite multiple threads. It emphasizes that questions must be clearly defined for effective answers, as many inquiries are too vague or resemble homework assignments, which the forum discourages. Users are encouraged to engage more by sharing their solutions instead of abandoning threads. The conversation suggests that the absence of answers may stem from a reluctance to provide help on homework-related queries. Overall, clarity and active participation are essential for productive discussions in physics forums.
LearninDaMath
Messages
295
Reaction score
0
Physics news on Phys.org
when it comes to this particular question
Those are three different, but related, questions about vector manipulation. Not one particular question.

Q1. Is there any systematic manner on how to prove [geometric theorems] using vectors?
A. No.

Q2. Find y component of vector C from its length and the angle it makes with the x axis
C_y = C\sin\theta ... provided in the thread (post #6).
You should be able to figure this out from the trig relations - remember SOH CAH TOA?

Q3. this last is for vector addition using geometry.
You do this numerically by resolving the vectors into components and using normal addition.
Also be scale diagram, drawing the vectors head-to-tail, and measuring.

In this specific example C=A+B where angle between them is θ - put one vector along the x-axis and resolve components of the other one.C = \sqrt{(A+B\cos\theta)^2 + (B\sin\theta)^2}=\sqrt{A^2 + B^2 + 2AB\cos\theta}\phi = \tan^{-1}\bigg ( \frac{B\sin\theta}{A+B\cos\theta} \bigg )so vector C will have magnitude C and will have an angle \phi to A.
The lynchpin is given in post #3.

How come ... there are many threads by various people, but never an answer or explanation in response to this question?
Just going by your examples, this is probably because we don't do your homework for you. The only way you'll get the kind of result you are looking for is if the OP posts it.
Q1. not specific enough to answer - OP was asked for examples and chose not to reply.
Q2 and 3. both homework: against the rules.

Too many people just abandon a thread when they have enough information to solve their problem instead of posting the solution they came up with.
 
Last edited:
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top