Question about an Eqn. in Shankar - wave function probability

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of probability in quantum mechanics, specifically related to the projection operator and wave function collapse as presented in Shankar's text. Participants are examining the relationship between the probability of measurement outcomes and the mathematical representation of projection operators.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the form of the probability expression, particularly whether it should involve the squared modulus of the inner product. There are inquiries about the explicit form of the projection operator when the eigenvalue is not degenerate and the implications of using this operator in calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of projection operators and their mathematical representation. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these definitions on the probability calculations, with no clear consensus yet on the best approach or interpretation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of quantum mechanics terminology and concepts, including the distinction between operators and vectors, as well as the implications of degeneracy in eigenvalues.

Jacob Nie
Messages
9
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
The section is about the probability of obtaining a certain ##\omega## upon measurement of operator ##\Omega.## And here it is dealing specifically with the case of a degenerate ##\Omega.##

It says: In general, one can replace in Postulate III
$$P(\omega)\propto \langle \psi | \mathbb{P}_{\omega}|\psi\rangle $$
where ##\mathbb{P}_{\omega}## is the projection operator for the eigenspace with eigenvalue ##\omega.##

(Postulate III was ##P(\omega)\propto |\langle \omega | \psi \rangle |^2.##)
Relevant Equations
n/a
I don't see why it is not ##P(\omega)\propto |\langle \psi | \mathbb{P}_{\omega}|\psi\rangle |^2.## After all, the wavefunction ends up collapsing from ##|\psi\rangle## to ##\mathbb{P}_{\omega}|\psi\rangle.##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jacob Nie said:
It says: In general, one can replace in Postulate III
$$P(\omega)\propto \langle \psi | \mathbb{P}_{\omega}|\psi\rangle $$
where ##\mathbb{P}_{\omega}## is the projection operator for the eigenspace with eigenvalue ##\omega.##

I don't see why it is not ##P(\omega)\propto |\langle \psi | \mathbb{P}_{\omega}|\psi\rangle |^2.## After all, the wavefunction ends up collapsing from ##|\psi\rangle## to ##\mathbb{P}_{\omega}|\psi\rangle.##
What is the explicit form of ##\mathbb{P}_{\omega}## when ##\omega## is not degenerate? When this ##\mathbb{P}_{\omega}## is used in ##\left< \psi \right| \mathbb{P}_{\omega} \left|\psi \right> ##, what results?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jacob Nie
George Jones said:
What is the explicit form of ##\mathbb{P}_{\omega}## when ##\omega## is not degenerate? When this ##\mathbb{P}_{\omega}## is used in ##\left< \psi \right| \mathbb{P}_{\omega} \left|\psi \right> ##, what results?

The explicit form would be ##\mathbb{P}_{\omega} = |\omega\rangle \langle \omega | \psi \rangle.## So, ##\langle \psi | \mathbb{P}_{\omega}| \psi \rangle = \langle \psi | \omega \rangle \langle \omega | \psi \rangle = |\langle \omega | \psi \rangle |^2.##

Thank you very much for the helpful hint.
 
Now, a projection operator is an operator, not a vector. Let ##\Omega## be an observable, ##\hat{\Omega}## its representing self-adjoint operator. For an eigenvalue ##\omega## there may be several linearly independent eigenvectors ("degeneracy"). They form a subvector space of the Hilbert space, ##\text{Eig}(\hat{\Omega},\omega)##, and you always can choose an orthonormal basis ##|\omega,\alpha \rangle##. For simplicity I assume the ##\alpha## are just discrete labels and we deal with true normalizable eigenvectors. The generalization if you have continuous generalized eigenvectors "normalized to a ##\delta## distribution" is straight forward.

Then the projection operator to the subspace ##\text{Eig}(\hat{\Omega},\omega)## is
$$\hat{P}_{\omega} = \sum_{\alpha} |\omega,\alpha \rangle \langle \omega,\alpha|.$$
Then the probability to find the value ##\omega## when measuring ##\Omega## when the system is prepared in a pure state represented by a normalized state vector ##|\psi \rangle## is, according to Born's postulate,
$$P(\omega|\psi)=\langle \psi|\hat{P}_{\omega}|\psi \rangle=\sum_{\alpha} \langle \psi|\omega,\alpha \rangle \langle \omega,\alpha|\psi \rangle = \sum_{\alpha} |\psi(\omega,\alpha)|^2.$$
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K