Question about camera lens taking a picture

AI Thread Summary
A camera can take a picture even if half of its lens is covered because light rays from an object, which are nearly parallel when entering the lens, still reach the sensor. Blocking outer rays, such as by closing the iris diaphragm, does not prevent the central rays from forming an image. The rays originate from a single point on the object, and the lens focuses them onto the focal plane. Light rays do bend due to refraction, and covering the lens symmetrically primarily alters image brightness. Non-symmetrical obstructions can lead to various optical processing techniques, but the fundamental principle of image formation remains unchanged.
Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2
Hey guys,

Can someone give a basic explanation of why a camera can take a picture even if half of its lens is covered up?

Thanks guys...
 
Science news on Phys.org
In the image below, the red lines represent light rays from an object directly in front of the lens and located far away so that the light is very nearly parallel when it enters the lens. If you block off the outer rays, perhaps by closing the iris diaphragm, you still have rays entering the camera so you still have an image. Perhaps the key thing to understand is that all of these rays originated from a single point on the object. So if you took a picture of your friend, where the center of the image is at his chest, then these rays all came from a single point on his chest located directly in front of the center of the lens. The rays that came from his nose would be tilted at an angle when entering the lens (imagine tilting all the red rays so that they are traveling downwards slightly). The lens would then focus all of those rays onto a spot at the focal plane further down from the center.

Does that make sense?

optics-kids-lenses-fig1.gif
 
Okay, thank you I think I get it. Also, do the light rays bend due to refraction?
 
Dixanadu said:
Okay, thank you I think I get it. Also, do the light rays bend due to refraction?

Yes they do.
 
Aside: "Covering" the lens is effectively what the iris in the eye or aperture in a camera does. It's primary effect is to alter the brightness of the image.
 
It's worth pointing out that this thread assumes that the lens is covered symmetrically- stopping down or conversely, introducing a central obscuration (catadiopteric lenses). Obscuring the lens in a non-axisymmetric fashion leads to various optical processing techniques, such as:

Foucault knife-edge test
Schlieren imaging
Aperture synthesis
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
Andy Resnick said:
It's worth pointing out that this thread assumes that the lens is covered symmetrically- stopping down or conversely, introducing a central obscuration (catadiopteric lenses). Obscuring the lens in a non-axisymmetric fashion leads to various optical processing techniques, such as:

Foucault knife-edge test
Schlieren imaging
Aperture synthesis
agreed, Andy

when I first read the OP stating the lens was 1/2 covered I was considering a blockage coming up say from the bottom so only the top 1/2 was passing light

optics-kids-lenses-fig2.GIF


Drakikith assumed a symmetrical aperture closing arrangement ... not sure if that was what the OP had in mind ?
 
davenn said:
Drakikith assumed a symmetrical aperture closing arrangement ... not sure if that was what the OP had in mind ?

That's a possibility. Still, the basic explanation doesn't change. Rays of light are still getting through even with half the lens covered so there's still an image formed.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
OK :) I was trying to visualise that
 
Back
Top