Question about charge, q, that appears in various EM equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter cronanster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Em
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the charge (q) in electromagnetic equations like Coulomb's Law and the Lorentz Force, specifically regarding the use of ionic charges. It confirms that one can use the net charge of ions, such as aluminum (3+) and fluoride (1-), to calculate forces, but emphasizes that charges must be in Coulombs rather than atomic units. The conversation highlights that Coulomb's Law is an approximation, primarily valid for larger separations compared to atomic dimensions, and that deviations may occur at closer distances. The participants express curiosity and enthusiasm for learning more about the topic, reflecting a deeper interest in physics and engineering concepts. This exchange underscores the importance of understanding the nuances of charge in electromagnetic interactions.
cronanster
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have a question about the charge, q, that appears in, say, Coulomb's Law, Lorenz Force, etc.

Can you use the charge associated with various ions? Say I wanted to find the force on aluminum by fluoride (I don't know why, those are just the first two off the top of my head). Aluminum has a charge of 3+ and fluoride has a charge 1-, and separated by some distance r.

Am I right in my thinking? And can the same be true with other equations dealing with electricity and magnetism?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sort of - you need to have the charge in Coloumbs, not atomic units, but other than that, yes.
 
Ah OK. That actually makes a lot of sense. The charge of the ions is more of a net charge (comparing electrons to protons). Sometimes I think too hard about things, haha.
 
cronanster said:
Ah OK. That actually makes a lot of sense. The charge of the ions is more of a net charge (comparing electrons to protons). Sometimes I think too hard about things, haha.

Well you're actually onto something here! In reality, you are correct to note that it's only a net charge and this DOES make a difference. Specifically, using coulomb's law is only an approximation to the true force (albeit, likely to be a very good one). In more detail than you probably care to know, this is selecting only the monopole term in the full multipolar expansion, which is a good approximation when you are concerned with separations much larger than the typical atomic diameter (angstroms). However, if you were to measure the force between the ions when they are close compared to this, you would observe a departure from the normal coulomb force.
 
Well now you have me all kinds of curious! I have just finished my sophmore year of mechanical engineering, I have physics one and two, and chemistry 1 and 2 completed, and working on diff eq this summer, along with dynamics. So I still kind of "n00b" if you will. But every time I leave class I get more and more and intrigued with everything. I have have questions.

At school I am pretty much a fat kid in a candy shop!
 
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
9K
Back
Top