Question about charged disk and current loop similarity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the differences between the electric field of a charged ring and the magnetic field of a current loop, highlighting the application of the Biot-Savart law and Coulomb's law. It notes that the electric field at the center of the charged disk cancels due to symmetry, leading to a cosine dependence, while the magnetic field at the center of the current loop is strongest, resulting in a sine dependence. The key distinction lies in the orientation of the field elements: the electric field is directed along the line to the point of measurement, while the magnetic field is perpendicular to that line. This difference in orientation necessitates the use of sine for the magnetic field and cosine for the electric field when defining angles. Overall, the understanding of these concepts is confirmed through the analysis of their respective equations.
bitrex
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
I have a question regarding the similarity between the Biot-Savart law and the equation that gives the magnetic field inside a current loop, and the similar version of Coloumb's law that gives the electric field due to a charged ring. In the equation for a charged ring at http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/electric/elelin.html the equation is multiplied by the cosine of the angle between the point where the field is measured and the disk, however in the similar situation for a current carrying loop using Biot-Savart the equation is multiplied by the sine of the angle. See: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/curloo.html#c2 My understanding of the difference is that in the case of the electric field the forces at the center of the disk are canceling by symmetry, hence when the angle is 90 degrees (at the center) the cosine is 0 and there is no force there. In the case of the current carrying wire, the magnetic field is strongest at the center of the loop and falls off with distance, so the sine of 90 degrees is 1 and decreases as the field is measured up the Z axis. I just want to make sure my understanding is correct - thanks for any help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The difference between the two cases is that the electric field element ##d\vec E## is along the line joining the charge element to the point on the axis whereas the magnetic field element ##d\vec B## is perpendicular to the line joining the charge element to the point on the axis. Thus, when you define the angle in a similar manner in the two cases, if you use the sine for the vertical component in one case, you have to use the cosine in the other.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top