Question about common math operations.

  • Thread starter Thread starter zeromodz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operations
zeromodz
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
Okay say we know from magnetism.

E = F / q
F = KQq / R^2

Then we can say that.

E = KQq / (R^2 / q)

Then wouldn't we say
E = KQq * q / R^2
E = KQq^2 / R^2

Its just like saying.
5 / (1 / 2) = 5 * 2 / 1 = 10.

Why is it we cancel the q's instead of squaring them, because my textbook does that and ends up with this equation.
E = KQ / R^2

Because the answers are different. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
zeromodz said:
Okay say we know from magnetism.

E = F / q
F = KQq / R^2

Then we can say that.

E = KQq / (R^2 / q)
No, we can't say this.
It's really E = (KQq/R^2) / q, which is the same as (KQq/R^2) * (1/q). The order in which you do the division is significant.

It might be easier to see formatted as it usually is in print.
E = \frac{F}{q} = \frac{1}{q} F
= \frac{1}{q} \frac{KQq}{R^2}
= \frac{KQ}{R^2}

The q factors cancel because you have one of them in a numerator and the other in a denominator.
zeromodz said:
Then wouldn't we say
E = KQq * q / R^2
E = KQq^2 / R^2

Its just like saying.
5 / (1 / 2) = 5 * 2 / 1 = 20.
This is not right, either. 5/(1/2) = 5*2 = 10
zeromodz said:
Why is it we cancel the q's instead of squaring them, because my textbook does that and ends up with this equation.
E = KQ / R^2

Because the answers are different. Thanks.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top