Question about dielectrics in capacitors

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jaredvert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitors Dielectrics
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 3K views
jaredvert
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
How come an insulator is put in between two capacitors? I realize it is to polarize the atoms and create a smaller electric field and hence smaller electric pressure/voltage and increase the capacitance. But why not use a conductor? Pretty much all the charge would cancel. OR am I missing a huge detail in that insulators actually TouCH the capacitors? If so then that explains why you couldn't use a conductor (since the charge would cancel) but why not use a conductor but just have it not touch either capacitor? Isn't that still polarization and the electric field become smaller? Please elucidate. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
UltrafastPED said:
The dielectric fills the space between the plates (or coiled sheets) - it is simply a replacement for the air, which is also a dielectric.

How it works is explained here: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/dielec.html
But why not use a conductor, but just not have it touch the plates of the capacitor? That way no "leakage" but an effectively smaller electric field
 
The question seems pertinent to the definition of a capacitor "simply two conducting plates separated by some distance". Addition of another conductor in between them will be tantamount to splitting the capacitor into two capacitors such that:
Voltage rating of the each new capacitor was halved (if the introduced plate was of negligible thickness). Practically it will be reduced even more.
Capacitance of the individual capacitor would be doubled due to reduction of the new separation to half of the original one.
Now visualize these two "new capacitors" as if they were connected in series and see if they are different from the original capacitor i.e. before introduction of the mid plate. They are the same if the mid plate is of "zero" thickness. Otherwise it has degraded by all means - leaving no benefit to do that

Regards
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
Zafariqbal82 said:
The question seems pertinent to the definition of a capacitor "simply two conducting plates separated by some distance". Addition of another conductor in between them will be tantamount to splitting the capacitor into two capacitors such that:
Voltage rating of the each new capacitor was halved (if the introduced plate was of negligible thickness). Practically it will be reduced even more.
Capacitance of the individual capacitor would be doubled due to reduction of the new separation to half of the original one.
Now visualize these two "new capacitors" as if they were connected in series and see if they are different from the original capacitor i.e. before introduction of the mid plate. They are the same if the mid plate is of "zero" thickness. Otherwise it has degraded by all means - leaving no benefit to do that

Regards
I love that answer! Great job. Cookie for you!
 
Where should I send this cookie to?
 
jaredvert said:
But why not use a conductor, but just not have it touch the plates of the capacitor? That way no "leakage" but an effectively smaller electric field

In principle, you could fill the dielectric space with a conductor - leaving a minuscule air gap. That would produce a very high value of capacitance but a maximum operating voltage which would be ridiculously small, because the gap would break down so easily. Using an appropriate material as a insulator (dielectric) means that the ready polarisation of the dielectric allows a charge build up right next to each of the capacitor plates without voltage breakdown. So, in many respects, the dielectric gives the effect of a much smaller gap.

There is a compromise between Max Operating Voltage and Max Obtainable Capacitance, for any particular technology and allowable physical sizes for the Capacitor. Electrolytic capacitors are operated with a continuous offset voltage across them which deposits (electrolytically) a very thin layer of dielectric between the plates, giving a much higher Capacitance than if you were to use plastic / mica / paper etc.. See also the construction of SuperCapacitors (loads of Google Hits).
 
sophiecentaur said:
In principle, you could fill the dielectric space with a conductor - leaving a minuscule air gap. That would produce a very high value of capacitance but a maximum operating voltage which would be ridiculously small, because the gap would break down so easily. Using an appropriate material as a insulator (dielectric) means that the ready polarisation of the dielectric allows a charge build up right next to each of the capacitor plates without voltage breakdown. So, in many respects, the dielectric gives the effect of a much smaller gap.
There is a compromise between Max Operating Voltage and Max Obtainable Capacitance, for any particular technology and allowable physical sizes for the Capacitor. Electrolytic capacitors are operated with a continuous offset voltage across them which deposits (electrolytically) a very thin layer of dielectric between the plates, giving a much higher Capacitance than if you were to use plastic / mica / paper etc.. See also the construction of SuperCapacitors (loads of Google Hits).
What is voltage breakdown exactly? How does it occur?