Question about equations and a matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter finchie_88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the values of p for which a system of three equations has solutions. The matrix formed by the equations is singular, indicated by a zero determinant, leading to either no solutions or an infinite number of solutions depending on p. It is clarified that if the determinant is zero, the system may have solutions for specific values of p where one equation coincides with another. Row reduction shows that a particular condition must be met for infinite solutions, while other values lead to no solutions. The conversation highlights the complexity of understanding the implications of singular matrices in linear systems.
finchie_88
I got a question today, that was a bit strange, it was this:
For what value(s) of p do the following equations have solutions?
4x + y + 5z = 12
3x + 2y + 5z = p
8x + 5y + 13z = 0

I said that it doesn't matter what value p is, there are never any solutions (regardless of what p is), since the matrix of the three equations is singular, was I right in thinking that? I also said that the equations give three planes which all intersect, but not at a unique solution, so they form a prism.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you are not. If the determinant of the matrix had been non-zero, then you would have been correct in saying that the system has solutions no matter what p is. However, if the determinant is zero, so that the matrix is singular, then there are two alterernatives (the "Fredholm alternative"): either the system has no solution or it has an infinite number of solutions. For what values of p does the augmented matrix reduce to something that has a solution?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
No, you are not. If the determinant of the matrix had been non-zero, then you would have been correct in saying that the system has solutions no matter what p is. However, if the determinant is zero, so that the matrix is singular, then there are two alterternatives (the "Fredholm alternative"): either the system has no solution or it has an infinite number of solutions. For what values of p does the augmented matrix reduce to something that has a solution?
Right, I can't see any values which p can take to give an infinite number of solutions, so I said that p can take any value (there would still be no solutions), that is why I said that there are no solutions, and that they form a prism since any pair of equations are consistent, however, are not consistent with the third. btw, the determinant is zero, so the matrix is singular.
 
finchie_88 said:
Right, I can't see any values which p can take to give an infinite number of solutions, so I said that p can take any value (there would still be no solutions), that is why I said that there are no solutions, and that they form a prism since any pair of equations are consistent, however, are not consistent with the third. btw, the determinant is zero, so the matrix is singular.

Right?? You say "right" and then contradict what I just said! IF the determinant of the matrix is non-zero, then there is a unique solution for all p. If the determinant of the matrix is 0, then there exist no solution for some values of p and an infinite number of solutions for other values of p. For some values of p, the second equation coincides with one of the others so there are an infinite number of solutions. Doing a row-reduction, I get
\left(\begin{matrix}4&1&5&12\\0&\frac{5}{4}&\frac{5}{4}&p-9\\0&0&0&-\frac{12}{5}p-\frac{108}{5}\end{matrix}\right)
As long as that last term in the third row is not 0, there is no solution. If it is 0, then there are an infinite number of solutions. For what value of p is -\frac{12}{5}p-\frac{108}{5}= 0?
 
That right was more of a "oh, you make it sound as though it's an obvious and simple concept" right, (it's a bit hard to get across such unwritten messages without speech! - lol, don't worry about it), anyway, that's not really important. Thank you for the help HOI. Help was much appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top